Who pays · and out of which pocket

Who really pays your plan's administrative fees.

Every 401(k) costs something to run. The question that matters is not the number, it is the pocket. When plan costs are deducted from participant accounts, the largest balance pays the largest share, and in a small company that balance is usually the owner's.

Read~5 minApplies toSmall-plan 401(k) sponsorsSource408(b)(2) disclosure · Schedule C
The only distinction that matters

Company dollars, or retirement dollars.

A plan's recordkeeping, administration, and advisory costs can be settled two ways. The company can pay them from operating cash, or the plan can pay them from the assets inside it. Both are legal. They are not remotely equivalent.

Paid by the company

A deductible business expense

The invoice arrives, the company pays it, and the cost is generally a deductible business expense. The retirement balances are untouched and keep compounding.

Paid from plan assets

A permanent reduction in retirement money

The same cost is deducted from participant accounts. Nothing is deductible to the company, because the company never paid it. And the dollars removed are the ones that had decades of tax-sheltered compounding ahead of them. You did not save the expense. You moved it to the most expensive pocket you own.

How the split actually lands

Pro rata means the owner pays most.

Asset-based fees are charged as a percentage of each account. A twenty-employee plan does not divide its costs into twenty equal pieces; it divides them in proportion to balances.

In most small companies the owner has been contributing longest, at the highest deferral, on the highest compensation. So the owner's account quietly absorbs the largest single share of the plan's operating cost, in the least tax-efficient way available. Employees pay too, in the same proportion, which is why the arrangement is also a fiduciary question and not only a personal one.

The arithmetic is not subtle. On a $3 million plan, a difference of half a percentage point in all-in cost is $15,000 a year, drawn from retirement balances, compounding against the people it was supposed to serve. Over a normal 20-year career, that $15,000 a year, compounded at 8%, becomes roughly $686,000 that was supposed to stay in those balances.

Why you may never have seen a bill

Revenue sharing: the fee that arrives as an absence.

Many small plans have never received an invoice at all, which owners understandably read as evidence the plan is free. It is usually evidence of indirect compensation: the funds in the lineup pay a portion of their expense ratios back to the recordkeeper or broker, out of participant assets, before anyone sees a statement.

That is the mechanism behind 12b-1 payments, sub-transfer-agency fees, and shelf arrangements. It is disclosed, but not on the annual filing. It appears in the 408(b)(2) service provider disclosure the provider is required to give the plan sponsor, and, on full filings only, in Schedule C.

Most small plans file the Form 5500-SF, which does not carry Schedule C, so the public record shows nothing. The payments continue regardless. The only way to see them is to read your own 408(b)(2) disclosure and your fund lineup side by side.

The three documents

What to request, in writing.

Document one

The 408(b)(2) disclosure

Ask your recordkeeper for the current service provider disclosure. It must state direct and indirect compensation, and whether the provider acknowledges fiduciary status.

Document two

The fund lineup with expense ratios

Every fund, its share class, and its net expense ratio. Share class is where the revenue sharing usually hides: the same fund often exists in a cheaper institutional class the plan qualifies for.

Document three

The fee allocation method

In writing: which costs the company pays, which are deducted from accounts, and whether the deduction is pro rata by balance or per head. Then decide, deliberately, which pocket you want it to come from.

Short answers

Questions owners actually ask.

Question

Is it illegal for participants to pay plan fees?

No. Paying reasonable plan expenses from plan assets is permitted. The ERISA question is whether the fees are reasonable for the services received and whether the fiduciary evaluated them. Never having looked is the exposure, not the arrangement itself.

Question

Can the company just start paying the fees instead?

Frequently yes, and for an owner with the largest balance it is often both a tax improvement and a fiduciary improvement. It should be documented as a decision rather than a drift.

Question

Will my Form 5500 show what we pay?

A full Form 5500 with Schedule C shows provider compensation. The Form 5500-SF, which most small plans file, does not, so the public record is effectively silent on cost.

Keep reading

Where this goes next.

What code 2R on a Form 5500 meansWhat ERISA §402(a) makes an owner personally responsible forHow to read your own Form 5500What the 5500 review gives you
Or let us read it

We will pull the filing and tell you what is in it.

One finding and two questions, from your own Form 5500, within two business days. No call required, no cost, and nothing to sign. Companies of ten to fifty employees with roughly $1 to $5 million in plan assets are the ones we can help most.

Request your 5500 review

Accountant or advisor forwarding this to a client? Use the CPA referral page.

GlacierWealth, Inc. is a fee-only Registered Investment Adviser, independent since 2001. This guide is informational and educational only: not investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice, and not personalized to any reader's circumstances. Form 5500 filings are public but may be incomplete or outdated, and any observation drawn from one is confirmed against plan documents before it is relied on. Descriptions of ERISA obligations are general; consult your own counsel about your plan.